Arbitration and Judicial Settlement Compared
(2,407 words)

paragraph 2 in volume 1, chapter 1, Introduction

previous paragraph

At this point a brief comparison between the essential generic characteristics of international arbitration and those of judicial settlement before the International Court is required. The differentiation is strictly observed in current international practice. Article 33 of the Charter lists the various established means for the pacific settlement of international disputes, and, in this respect following Article 13 of the Covenant of the League of Nations, mentions separately arbitration …

Cite this page
Malcolm N. Shaw, “Arbitration and Judicial Settlement Compared”, in: Rosenne's Law and Practice of the International Court: 1920-2015. Consulted online on 26 June 2017 <http://dx.doi.org/10.1163/2468-5992_rose_COM_0002>
First published online: 2017
First print edition: 20161001



▲   Back to top   ▲