Religion Past and Present

Get access
Search Results: | 14 of 171 |

(593 words)

[German Version]

In the culture of ethical argumentation, every inference of an “ought”-statement from an “is”-statement is today still largely rejected as a “naturalistic fallacy.” The prevailing standpoint is that the contents of all imperatives (universal, general, or pertaining to individual cases) can only be inferred from sets of premises, the maior of which is in turn an “ought”-statement. Consequently, contents of imperatives (Norms) and binding goals of action can no longer be justified in reference to natural law (to the nature of the object), but …

Cite this page
Herms, Eilert, “Is/Ought”, in: Religion Past and Present. Consulted online on 15 August 2022 <>
First published online: 2011
First print edition: ISBN: 9789004146662, 2006-2013

▲   Back to top   ▲