Author(s):
Segal, Robert Alan
|
Kamel, Susan
|
Müller, Hans-Peter
|
Graf, Fritz
|
Cancik, Hubert
|
Et al.
[German Version] I. Religious Studies – II. History – III. Philosophy of Religion – IV. Fundamental Theology. – V. Missiology
I. Religious Studies
1. The Concept and Its History Myth may be defined by either content or function. Defined by content, myth is a belief
about something significant, such as the world or society. Defined by function, myth
accomplishes something significant, such as explaining the world or supporting society. Most theories of myth are concerned with the
function of myth, but many are also concerned with either the
origin or the
subject matter of myth. Mythology then refers to the system of different myths within a religion or culture. ¶ Nineteenth-century theories tended to view myth as a prescientific explanation of the physical world. For the key theorists, E.B. Tylor and J.G. Frazer, a myth says, for instance, that rain falls because a god decides to send it. The explanation is personalistic rather than, as in science, impersonal. For Tylor myth provides knowledge of the world for its own sake. For Frazer, that knowledge is a means to control the world. For both, myth is the “primitive counterpart” to science, itself entirely modern. “Modern myth” is a self-contradiction. Twentieth-century theorists have not challenged science as the reigning explanation of the physical world. Instead, they have recharacterized the myth to make it compatible with science. Either the function has been taken as other than explanation, or the subject matter has been read as other than the physical world. The issue has not been whether “primitives” but whether moderns can have myth…